🔗 Share this article

Iran is ready to reinitiate atomic talks with the United States as long as it is handled with "respect" and "honor", Iran's foreign minister has stated.

The Iranian diplomat said exclusively dialogue produced results, and disclosed new appeals had been made by mediators to resume talks with the Trump administration. He claimed Iran possessed no unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran could not yet permit the International Atomic Energy Agency to access struck enrichment centers for security reasons.

Navigating a Difficult Course

The foreign minister is walking a challenging route since Iran aims to avoid appear to be proceeding from a position of disadvantage, and he consistently maintained that Iran had arisen stronger militarily and emotionally from the joint assault on its nuclear sites in June.

He was speaking at a security conference in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to process nuclear material on home soil that it will perpetually retain" – the main reason of the impasse in the earlier negotiations.

Earlier Talks Unexpectedly Concluded

The prior phases of discussions between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and hostile conclusion on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, targeted Iran's enrichment centers in a two-week conflict that ended with Donald Trump asserting the sites had been obliterated. Afterward, European countries exercised their authority to reimpose global restrictions, but Iran maintains they have not had a major impact.

Ideal Resolution Proposed

Iran's diplomats said they felt they had achieved a "magic solution" to the enrichment issue in previous talks, when it was agreed an local partnership with US participation could process nuclear material. The two nations would have been able to claim victory since domestic enrichment would have persisted and the US could be assured that Iran's enrichment initiative was entirely non-military.

It had not been decided in the discussions that American atomic experts could function on Iranian soil, but that was a reasonable assumption of the cooperative offer. Officials stated three times they had achieved a deal with the US representative Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to fall apart due to "spoilers in Washington".

Present Status

Tehran representatives said the cooperative arrangement was now withdrawn, but it seems quite possible the proposal could be reintroduced in some form if negotiations resume.

Trump recently stated he had been obtaining communications that Iran wanted to restart talks, but in private Iranian officials say they are not yet receiving consistent overtures from the United States either directly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, Egypt, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Iranian foreign ministry has been accused of non-responsiveness in the face of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran says negotiations is not part of a spectacle.

Diplomatic Standpoint

In his address to the conference, aimed to paint the US as a dominant force that abuses the idea of global regulations, the foreign minister declared the fortnight-long engagement showed the clash could not be resolved by combat operations. He asserted the strikes started with a US demand for an complete Tehran capitulation and concluded with an absolute demand for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is convinced the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were executed with full US knowledge and coordination, making confidence hard to restore.

Dialogue Remains the Final Answer

Araghchi said: "Tehran was not the one that had abandoned diplomacy; it was America and the western countries that had consistently sought to impose their desires during the talks. Diplomacy can still be viable and remains the final resolution to resolve conflicts, but its criteria, guidelines and principles must be respected."

"If they address to the Iranian people with the language of respect and honor, they will receive a response in the identical approach."

Repair and Recovery

In what is described by Iranian officials as the struggle of repair and recovery, the foreign minister stated he was certain Iran's military capacities "have significantly improved than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been rebuilt. We learned many lessons from this conflict; we have identified our personal limitations and the vulnerabilities of the adversary."

He continued: "We managed to survive this engagement. Our enrichment knowledge, which they aimed to destroy, stays intact. The sites and equipment, if damaged, will be restored; what is important is the will of the Iranian people and then the social solidarity that they targeted, but were unable to break. The citizens of Tehran have grown stronger, more cohesive, and more backing of the government and the state in the wake of this invasion."